For many years, coatings were primarily viewed as a maintenance expense – essential for corrosion protection, regulatory compliance, and periodic asset upkeep. However, increasing geopolitical instability, particularly around the Middle East and the Strait of Hormuz, is prompting a reassessment of their strategic value.
The conversation is no longer simply about paint performance.
Today, coatings influence operational resilience, fuel efficiency, production continuity, safety, and asset longevity. As shipping operators, offshore energy companies, and infrastructure owners navigate a more uncertain operating environment, coating systems are increasingly being recognised as critical contributors to commercial and operational performance.
Has geopolitical conflict elevated coatings from maintenance cost to strategic asset protection?
Follow the discussion. Watch the full video on-demand.
Today, coatings influence operational resilience, fuel efficiency, production continuity, safety, and asset longevity. As shipping operators, offshore energy companies, and infrastructure owners navigate a more uncertain operating environment, coating systems are increasingly being recognised as critical contributors to commercial and operational performance.
From maintenance activity to strategic asset protection
Periods of geopolitical disruption place significant pressure on global shipping and energy infrastructure. Rising fuel costs, supply chain uncertainty, restricted trade routes, and heightened operational risk all increase the importance of asset reliability.
In this environment, coatings are no longer just a protective barrier applied during maintenance cycles. Their performance directly affects:
- Vessel efficiency and fuel consumption
- Offshore production reliability
- Drydock and maintenance planning
- Asset integrity and safety
- Insurance and compliance exposure
- Long-term asset value
The consequences of coating failure now extend well beyond corrosion or cosmetic deterioration.
A poorly performing antifouling system can increase fuel consumption and operating costs at a time when fuel prices are highly volatile. Degraded corrosion protection can accelerate structural deterioration and increase maintenance demands. Deficiencies in passive fire protection coating systems may expose critical infrastructure to elevated operational, regulatory, and insurance risks.
As a result, coating decisions are increasingly becoming business-critical rather than purely technical or procurement-led.
Are coatings becoming part of energy security strategy?
“Current geopolitical tensions have had limited direct impact on the Energy & Infrastructure (E&I) sector, while their primary effect has been on commercial marine shipping, particularly crude oil tankers and bulk carriers operating through strategic trade routes such as the Strait of Hormuz.
The offshore oil and gas sector remains resilient. Shuttle tankers servicing FPSOs and FSOs operate locally rather than through high-risk shipping lanes, and sufficient global tanker capacity exists to support offshore production. Continued sanctions on Russian and Iranian crude, together with constrained supply, have helped sustain relatively high oil prices, supporting ongoing investment in offshore energy projects. Conversely, any easing of sanctions on Iranian exports could place downward pressure on prices, while tighter enforcement against the Russian shadow fleet could have the opposite effect.
Longer term, China's accelerating transition towards renewable energy and its substantial crude oil reserves are expected to moderate global oil demand growth.
Should disruption in the Strait of Hormuz continue, higher oil prices could improve the commercial viability of offshore developments in more geopolitically stable regions such as the North Sea and the Gulf of Mexico, potentially redirecting investment away from the Middle East.
From a coatings perspective, geopolitical uncertainty has relatively little direct impact on offshore energy assets. The greater challenge remains extending the service life of ageing facilities, where durable coating systems, passive fire protection (PFP), cathodic protection, corrosion under insulation (CUI) management and effective inspection regimes are critical to supporting 25+ year operational lifecycles and life-extension programmes. Asset owners continue to favour FPSO conversions, refurbishments, and fabric maintenance over newbuild projects to reduce capital expenditure and accelerate project delivery.”
Changing investment priorities
Historically, coating procurement has often been influenced by short-term capital cost considerations. However, geopolitical uncertainty is shifting attention towards lifecycle performance and risk reduction.
Asset owners are increasingly evaluating questions such as:
- What is the operational cost of premature coating failure?
- How much fuel inefficiency can be tolerated during periods of elevated bunker prices?
- What are the financial consequences of unplanned repairs or extended drydocking?
- How much downtime can critical offshore assets afford?
- Are maintenance decisions sufficiently robust to withstand insurer and stakeholder scrutiny?
These questions highlight a broader shift from lowest-cost procurement towards investment strategies focused on long-term operational performance.
Lifecycle performance vs lowest-cost procurement
The true cost of a coating system is rarely reflected in its purchase price alone.
While lower-cost solutions may appear attractive during procurement, the long-term consequences of under-specification, poor surface preparation, inadequate quality assurance, or unsuitable repair strategies can be substantial.
Potential impacts include:
- Increased fuel consumption through hull roughness and fouling
- Higher maintenance expenditure
- Unplanned off-hire and production interruptions
- Accelerated asset degradation
- Increased liability and compliance exposure
As a result, organisations are placing greater emphasis on:
- Evidence-based specification development
- Independent technical governance
- Lifecycle performance modelling
- Risk-based maintenance planning
The strategic question is increasingly becoming:
“What coating strategy best protects operational continuity and asset value over the next decade?”
rather than
“What is the lowest-cost solution available today?”
Antifouling performance and commercial competitiveness
The marine sector provides one of the clearest examples of this shift.
Fuel costs remain one of the largest operational expenses for shipowners and operators. During periods of market volatility, even modest increases in hull resistance can significantly affect voyage economics and profitability.
Consequently, greater attention is being paid to:
- Hull smoothness retention
- Fouling resistance
- Performance during idle periods
- Underwater cleaning strategies
- Coating selection based on trading profile
Are modern antifouling systems no longer viewed solely as maintenance or environmental compliance tools – or have they become operational performance assets capable of influencing the following?
- Fuel consumption
- Emissions performance
- Charter competitiveness
- Fleet profitability
The commercial value of sustained hull efficiency is driving greater investment in coating selection, performance monitoring, and technical oversight.
The growing importance of independent technical governance
As coating decisions become more closely linked to operational and financial outcomes, independent technical governance is becoming increasingly important.
Owners, operators, insurers, contractors, and investors require confidence that coating strategies are technically sound, commercially justified, and aligned with long-term asset objectives.
This is driving increased demand for:
- Independent specification reviews
- Drydock governance and oversight
- Antifouling optimisation programmes
- Coating failure investigations
- Passive fire protection coatings verification
- Lifecycle maintenance planning
The role of coating consultancy is therefore evolving beyond technical support. It is increasingly becoming a component of strategic risk management, helping organisations make more informed decisions about asset protection, operational resilience, and long-term performance.
Conclusion
Geopolitical instability is accelerating a broader industry shift in how coatings are valued. What was once regarded primarily as a maintenance expense is increasingly recognised as a strategic investment that influences operational continuity, efficiency, safety, and asset resilience.
As shipping, offshore energy, and infrastructure operators face greater commercial and geopolitical uncertainty, coating systems are moving closer to the centre of asset management strategy. Organisations that adopt a lifecycle-focused approach to coating performance are likely to be better positioned to protect critical assets, control long-term costs, and maintain operational reliability in an increasingly unpredictable world.
Which problems are affecting your organisation the most?
Be part of the discussion. Share your thoughts and let us know which of these problems are affecting you the most.
For more information on how Safinah can help with your coating-related challenges, speak with our experts. Contact us or email enquiries@safinah.com
