Cargo Hold Coatings – What can go wrong and what do we see?

 The cargo holds (excluding the tank tops) of bulk carriers are typically coated with specialist abrasion resistant coatings to provide protection against corrosion, pitting and cargo contamination.

As noted above it is generally standard practice to leave the tank tops either in bare steel, or the newbuild thin film shop primer, this is because any coating applied to the tank top would get badly damaged by cargo loading and discharging operations. Therefore ship builders normally build in a “corrosion allowance” or extra thickness of the tank top steel plates to allow for some general corrosion facilitated by the lack of protective coatings. For all areas other than the tank top a protective coating is applied.

However these coatings are exposed to a very aggressive climate that can cause significant damages to the coatings, particularly if they have been poorly applied and/or maintained. These conditions include factors such as:

• High levels of mechanical damage
• Exposure to chemically active cargos (coal, bauxite, coke, sulphur and petroleum coke)
• Exposure to high temperatures
• Exposure to high humidity
• Exposure to seawater (central cargo hold maybe in ballast on backhaul voyages).
• Exposure to salts

In summary cargo hold coatings are required to protect against impact, abrasion, humidity, heat, corrosion and prevent chemical and cathodic reactions.

Modes of coating failure:

The typical coating failures observed in cargo holds are as follows:

• Discolouration/staining – typically from carriage of coal cargos which are difficult to fully remove when cleaning after discharge.
• Scratches – to the hold coatings across the hopper plate, corrugated bulkhead and shell frames. Caused by mechanical impact and abrasion from cargo, grabs, bobcats and excavators etc.
• Corrosion – due to moisture in cargos or from seawater.
• Blistering – caused by acidic cargos, for example from the formation of sulphuric acid due to moisture in coal.
• Delamination/detachment – due to surface contamination, for example dry spray from application to the frames and shell plates, or dust/blasting grit falling onto the hopper plating and not removed prior to application of the coating.
• Loss of adhesion – due to insufficient surface preparation or lack of surface tolerance.
• Softness – due to high dry film thickness (DFT) from overapplication of the hold coatings.

Common reasons for cargo hold coating failures:

Safinah Group have extensive experience investigating cargo hold coating failures and the typical examples of failure observed include:

1. Failure due to poor workmanship in the shipyard.

• Cosmetic coats applied at newbuilding which lead to detachment and subsequent cargo contamination (photos 1 and 2).
• Solvent retention under restricted ventilation (when the cargo hatch is closed too early after application) or not following recommended minimum overcoating intervals.
• Blasting grit contamination (photo 3).
• Overapplication of the coating (photo 4) which leads to cargo gauging damages in service.
• Use of an inappropriate cargo hold coating.
• Poor surface preparation prior to application.